![turbo pascal emulator turbo pascal emulator](https://archive.org/serve/Turbo_Pascal_v3.00a_1985_Borland_cpm_version/Turbo_Pascal_v3.00a_1985_Borland_cpm_version_screenshot.gif)
![turbo pascal emulator turbo pascal emulator](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcGPGArXsAEuUjm.png)
By default, the EOL character is a colon it can be changed using the TTYSET utility. The "end of line" character denotes where a command ends and the next begins. The one gotcha is that the FLEX command interpreter allows more than one command to be typed on one line. The command line following the name of the CP/M program honors CP/M syntax everything before that is in FLEX lingo. In this example, the emulator resides on drive 3 the DUMP utility and HELLO.HEX reside on drive 2. Drive 0 corresponds to drive A:, 1 to B:, 2 to C: and 3 to D. The 6800 one is essentially maxed out because the I/O space is right in the middle of the address space at $8000.įLEX uses numbers to identify disk drives. Versions for the 68 have some room to grow. MBASIC weighs in at just under 24K and that is pretty tight within both of these emulators as I have them configured today. I found that out the hard way when trying to produce something for a CP/M users group many moons ago. Turbo Pascal is around 30K, but worse, it requires a Z80 processor for both the compiler and the programs it generates.
Turbo pascal emulator full#
There is also a PL/I compiler for CP/M and knowing Digital Research, it will not require a full boat system. CP/M is well known for allowing for quite a large memory environment for its programs. The biggest problem with Fortran and Cobol is going to be the amount of memory they require. Atari I/O is very complex and too many memory locations are reserved on the C64. Besides Corsham, it and the OSI line are the best candidates despite both having physical disk hardware totally incompatible with a majority of existing FLEX machines. I will admit to considering the Apple II as a possible platform to run my FLEX operating system for the 6502. ProDOS, huh? I have looked at it but have not done much with it other than a little bit of using a IIGS. Would like to add MSBasic to that list and try to port over Cobol, Fortran and Turbo Pascal as well. So far have Applesoft Basic, Integer Basic, Forth, Pascal, Logo, 9 advanced basics, 8 compilers and Aztec C, all working under Prodos on the Apple II. I would like to add it to my collection of languages. If you'd like to share, I would be interested.